JUDGMENT Aravind Kumar, J. - The point that arises for our consideration is whether 'tinted glass sheets' manufactured by the…
ORDER 1. The petitioner invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the…
JUDGMENT Abhay S. Oka, J. - FACTUAL ASPECTS 1. This is an appeal by accused no. 2 who has been…
JUDGMENT Aravind Kumar, J. - Judgment dated 09-01-2020 rendered in Criminal Appeal Nos.1063 of 2017, 997 & 1043 of 2017…
JUDGMENT Surya Kant, J. - The issue that falls for consideration in this case revolves around the true construction, meaning…
JUDGMENT Sanjiv Khanna, J. - This judgment interprets relevant provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003[1] and Rule 3 of the…
JUDGMENT 1. Leave Granted. 2. The respondent-accused was tried for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,…
K.V. Viswanathan, J. Shahu Sampatrao Jadhavar was employed as a watchman in the Respondent no. 2-Sugar Factory. His duty hours…
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is before this Court challenging the impugned order dated 11.11.2022, whereby the…
K. Vinod Chandran, J. Leave granted. 2. The question arising in this appeal is as to whether the family of…